Monday, November 25, 2013
Sunday, November 24, 2013
Sound Paper
Growing up in a church that was
similar in architecture and volume to a small cathedral, I could relate to much
of what Rasmussen was discussing in “Hearing Architecture”. Although it was not quite so large and
domed that the minister had to sing or talk rhythmically to address the
congregation, the large vaulted ceiling of the church caused much reverberation
so that when the choir sang there was a beautiful, ethereal quality to their
voices. This made the experience of attending church seem more heavenly and
sacred, and the large volume of the sanctuary which caused such an acoustical
quality created a grand kinesthetic experience of all its own. This was
definitely an example of how one can “Hear Architecture”. The acoustic quality
of the church service was directly affected by the high vaulted ceilings -- a
purposeful decision made by the architect to create an grandiose and heavenly
sound experience that reflected the sacred meanings of the hymns the choir was
singing. After attending other
churches, I missed the beautiful sounds that reverberated in the
sanctuary. Unfortunately this
tonal quality cannot be replicated unless the correct architecture is in place
to cause it, which is rare in the more modern churches of today.
Another
experience that I am familiar with along with most other people is the change
in sound quality when in a bathroom covered in sound reflecting tile. Singing
in the shower can make the tone anyone’s voice sound better, especially when
singing long vowel sounds, due to reverberation. As a chorus member throughout high school, I would always
rehearse songs in the shower because of the rich tone it would give my voice
due to the reflective tile. Many
other people sing in the shower for this reason. Bathrooms generally don’t have
absorptive materials in them so nothing hampers the sound’s ability to bounce
off of the tile surfaces and cause a slight echo. Bathrooms with higher ceilings enhance this effect, but can
almost hinder the ability to understand someone if you are talking to them
because the words you say take so long to bounce back to you and run together
if you are talking at a normal speed.
People generally do not have long conversations in the bathroom, but I
have been on the phone with people who are standing in a bathroom and it is
very hard to hear due to the high level of reverberation. This is why in
environments such as living rooms, restaurants, and offices where people will
be holding long conversations, good acoustic quality and absorptive materials
are crucial to one’s ability to understand speech. Dining in restaurants with little to no absorptive
materials, such as East Coast Wings on Tate Street, can be very frustrating
because you cannot hear the person you are talking to over the din of other
people’s conversations bouncing off of the walls.
Sound
quality is very important to the experience of a space. It can either cause the
experience to be pleasant, such as a reverberant cathedral, or unpleasant, such
as a noisy restaurant. It is up to the designer to ensure that the acoustics in
a space matches the needs of the user.
Saturday, November 16, 2013
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Sound Sketch Series
I examined the 3rd floor of the studio for my sound sketch. The materials in almost all of the spaces were simply painted gypsum walls, concrete floors, and hard steel and plastic furniture. This gave the sound more reverberation time, and echoed in spaces that were larger and more empty. Two exceptions to this were the library and computer lab which have carpeted floors and upholstered furniture. This greatly reduced sound in decibels as well as reverberation time. You can see a significant difference in all of the diagrams between the library/computer lab and the rest of the studio spaces. There is also a notable difference between times of the day, due to studio classes. You can see that at 11 am on a Monday, the studio spaces are fairly loud due to morning studio classes occupying the space. The decibel level increases around 4 pm when the afternoon studios are in the space as well, and students are hanging around to get work down in the afternoon. Noise levels greatly diminish at night when classes have left and only a few students are in the building to work.
Sound greatly impacts interior design and our experiences in a space. The desired acoustical environment determines what materials shall be put in a space, such as carpeting and upholstered furniture in the library, as well as the shape and volume of the space itself. Lowered ceilings in the library, conference room, and computer lab make sense because these spaces are desired to be quieter than studio spaces which are more collaborative. Sound can impact design decisions such as the inclusion and placement of acoustical panels, wall thickness, and insulation. Sound also influences your perception of privacy in a space- spaces tend to feel more private if they are quieter. This is why it is good to have different acoustical spaces in the studio to accommodate collaborative vs. independent work.
Sound Levels- 11 am Monday
Sound Levels- 4 pm Monday
Sound Levels- 9:30 pm Wednesday
Basement & Exterior: Studio Phase VI Deliverables
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Apartments: Studio Phase V Deliverables
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)